B J Kang Law PC
  • HOME
  • PEOPLE
  • SERVICES
    • KIC SV Sample Documents
  • CONTACT
  • PERSPECTIVES
  • Careers

Our Perspectives

Cryptocurrency Mining and International Tax Implications

9/8/2017

0 Comments

 
Like Al Capone before them, many in the coin mining industry are under the mistaken impression that the IRS and other government bodies abroad do not have authority to tax mining activities because the coins being mined are “not really regulated.” Unfortunately for them, this view is severely misguided.

The default rule in the U.S. is that the receipt of any sort of property, be it cash, real estate, securities, or even drugs, is a taxable event...unless the IRS or the Tax Code says otherwise. This means that as a default you recognize income, whether you are repaid for your efforts and/or investments in the form of cocaine, or you are mining coins.  This is good and bad news for mining pools and investors in those pools. While you are subject to U.S. taxation, knowing this ahead of time should allow you to plan and structure mining operations, pools, and investments appropriately. But what does it mean to be subject to taxation in a global economy?

Let’s take, as a case study, a mining pool with operations in the U.S. and with investors both within the U.S. and abroad. For all practical purposes, for the investor this is no different than  investing in any other sort of business within the United States. The U.S. operations means the pool is engaged in a U.S. trade or business, which in turn means that the business is subject to U.S. taxes, whether it earns profits in altcoins or U.S. dollars. For U.S. investors, there is no surprise that the mined coins should be included as income. If this business is passing profits through to its investors abroad, then we look to the appropriate tax treaties in effect between the U.S. and the country of residence of each foreign investor, and the various US-sourced income withholding rules. Structuring the relationship as an individual investor simply leasing mining equipment, as opposed to investing in a mining pool, does not change this basic principle, or the end result.

Typically, there are two possible characterizations of the income flowing out to a non-resident alien (NRA) investor: 1. It could be income effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business (ECI), or 2. It could be considered fixed and determinable periodic income (FDAP). FDAP is subject to withholding under IRC §1441(a). As a default, this means the payor (e.g., the mining pool in this instance) is required to withhold 30% of the GROSS payment to the NRA. This 30% rate is reduced in many instances depending on the particular investor’s country of residence and that country’s tax treaty with the United States.

On the other hand, ECI is exempt from this harsh withholding requirement and is instead subject to taxation on a NET basis at normal U.S. income tax rates. Depending on where an investor is located, structuring the mining activities to generate ECI may or may not be preferable to having the profits or payments treated as FDAP. These two classifications can have wildly different results, and the difference in classification can sometimes stem from very simple variations in structuring. This means that a little proactive planning for your mining investment and/or the setup of your mining operation/pool can go a long way towards reducing your tax burden.

​
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Business Immigration
    Business Planning And Corporate Transactions
    Federal And State Tax Planning
    International Tax


    Authors


    ​B.J. Kang JD, CPA
    Josh Portman JD, LL.M
    Habeeb Syed JD
    Nora Ji Li LL.M
    Nathaniel S. Johnson

    Archives

    December 2022
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    March 2020
    April 2019
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    January 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2013



    DISCLAIMER:
    The information contained on this web-site is not legal advice. The information may not reflect the most up-to-date legal developments.  Unless otherwise indicated in writing, any US federal tax advice contained in this web-site is not intended to be used, and cannot be used to (i) avoid penalties under the US Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promote, market or recommend to another party any matter addressed herein.

    RSS Feed

 
3135 Mount Vernon Ave., Alexandria, VA 22305 
3003 N. First St., San Jose, CA 95134 (CA Branch: KIC-SV)
Harvard Sq., 1 Mifflin Pl., STE 400, Cambridge, MA 02138 (MA Branch)
Telephone : 703-595-2836 Fax : 703-722-9168
Copyright © 2021 B.J. Kang Law, PC. All rights reserved.